Patent infringement case : Philips vs xiaomi recent patent violence case
Updated on : 2020-Dec-05 18:33:39 | Author :
Xiaomi to stay Rs 1000 crores in the bank, Vivo to not produce encumbrance in manufacturing plant when Philips moves Delhi High Court for patent infringement
Following to patent infringement suits by Philips before Delhi high court, Xiaomi has undertaken to keep up Rs. 1,000 cr in its bank accounts operated in India. ( THE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV VS THE XIAOMI & ORS) Vivo, on the opposite hand, has been directed to not produce any encumbrance or third-party rights within the manufacturing plant in Greater Noida. (THE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV VS THE VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS & ORS) Two separate orders to this result were lapsed 2 Single decide Benches of the high court. In its patent infringement, Philips has claimed that the 2 mobile manufactures have profaned its "Standard Essential Patents" in telecommunication technologies.
While dealing with the suit against Vivo for patent violence, one decides Bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher has called for an affidavit stating that Vivo has the title over larger Noida factory which it might not produce any encumbrance throughout the judgment of the moment case. The direction was passed when counsel for the parties united thereto so as to hasten the trial within the suit and final judgment. In the suit against Xiaomi, one decides Bench of Justice V Kameswar Rao directed that the main points of bank accounts operated in India wherever the amount of Rs. 1,000 crores are being maintained. Summons were additionally issued to Xiaomi within the suit for patent infringement. The suit against Vivo is detected next on Feb 10, 2021, for patent infringement. The suit against Xiaomi is detected next on March one, 2021. Senior Advocate CM Lall with Singh & Singh Advocates Ashutosh Kumar, Devanshu Khanna, Nancy Roy, Palash Maheshwari, Vrinda Bagaria, Munesh Sharma, Swapnil Dey, Saya Choudhary Kapur, Nikhil Chawla appeared for Philips. Xiaomi was pictured by Advocates Ravi Sharma, Amitava Mitra, Arjun Gadhoke, Aniruddh Bhatia. Vivo was pictured by Advocates Saikrishna Rajagopal, Siddharth Chopra, Julien martyr, Garima Sahney, Dr Amitavo Mitra, Anu Paarcha, Dr Victor Vaibhav Tandon, Arjun Gadhoke, Vivek Ayyagari, Avijit Kumar, Aniruddh Bhatia.
PHILIPS alleges patent infringement by Xiaomi, moves Delhi High Court to ban the sale of its mobiles
Philips has filed A CASE against Xiaomi India, alleging patent infringement and asked for the DELHI high court to ban sales of all Xiaomi's mobiles that are violating the company's patents.
Patent infringement case recent case study: PHILIPS has filed a case against XIAOMI India, alleging patent infringement and asked the DELHI supreme court to ban for sales of all Xiaomi’s mobiles, that are violating the company’s patents. The patents associated with UMTS sweetening (HSPA, HSPA+) and LTE technologies. Philips is alleging 3 patents are being infringement by Xiaomi India. Philips India has asked for an “ex-parte, ad-interim injunction” to be passed in its favour and desires all Xiaomi to be stopped from “manufacturing/assembling, importing, selling, providing purchasable, advertising as well as through their and third party websites,” its mobile phones that are infringement the company’s patents. It additionally wants an “ad-interim order of injunction be granted leading the Central Board of Excise and Customs to issue appropriate instructions to custom authorities at each port as well as airports in India to not enable the import” of Xiaomi’s mobile handsets, that is in patent infringement. In order, the DELHI high court has instructed Xiaomi India to keep up a number of Rs 1,000 crores in their bank accounts that are operated in India, til a future date of hearing the defendants. Xiaomi has additionally been asked to file the main points of the bank accounts operated in India wherever the quantity of Rs one thousand crores is being maintained, on or before 2nd Dec 2020, reads the Delhi high court order.
The DELHI high court has ordered or directed Xiaomi India to file its reply within 4 weeks. future hearing can turn up on Jan 18, 2021. we've got reached out to Xiaomi India for a discuss the difficulty still.
Would I like to contact an intellectual property attorney?
It depends. Following best practices could be a sensible begin, however, there might things wherever you wish the counsel of a legal skilled. as an example, you will need to file suit against a cybersquatter or defend against a legal challenge. notice a trademark lenstax lawyer close to you for help.
Additional Resources
